Preview

Modern Oriental Studies

Advanced search

Critique of Eurocentrism: The Sinological Position of S. M. Georgievsky

https://doi.org/10.24412/2686-9675-4-2025-112-122

Abstract

The article examines the scholarly position of the Russian sinologist S. M. Georgievsky, who in the second half of the 19th century opposed the prevailing Eurocentrism in sinology. In his works and polemics with contemporaries, he refuted the stereotype of China’s “stagnation,” highly valued Confucianism as a source of spiritual and social development and positively assessed the modernization reforms of the late Qing era. S. M. Georgievsky emphasized the independence and progressive potential of Chinese civilization, foreseeing its growing role in world history. His research remains significant today, contributing to a rethinking of the civilizational dialogue between East and West.

About the Author

X. Luo
Institute of Northeast Asian Studies, Jilin University
China

Luo Xuexin 



References

1. Martin, W. A. P. The lore of Cathay, Edinburgh London: Oliphant, Anderson & Ferrier, 1901. – 472 p.

2. Berezanskaia L. V. Osobennosti razvitiia kitaiskoi tsivilizatsii v istoricheskoi kontseptsii S.M. Georgievskogo. // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2007(1), pp. 144–146.

3. Vasil'ev L. S. Korifei russkogo kitaevedeniia. // Istoriia i kul'tura Kitaia (Sbornik pamiati akademika V. P. Vasil'eva). M.: Nauka, 1974. pp.7–19.

4. Vasil'ev V. P. Okrytie Kitaia i dr. st. Akademika V. P. Vasil'eva. SPb.: zhurn. "Vestnik vsemirnoi istorii", 1900. – 164 p.

5. Georgievskii S. M. Printsipy zhizni Kitaia. SPb.: A. Ia. Panafidin, 1888. – 494 p.

6. Georgievskii S. M. Graf I. Tolstoi i «Printsipy zhizni Kitaia». SPb.: tip. I.N. Skorokhodova, 1889. – 69 p.

7. Georgievskii S.M. Vazhnost' izucheniia Kitaia. SPb.: Tip. I. N. Skorokhodova, 1890. – 286 p.

8. Dubrovin N. F. Nikolai Mikhailovich Przheval'skii. SPb.: Voennaia tip., 1890. – 602 p.

9. Nikiforov V. N. Sovetskie istoriki o problemakh Kitaia. M.: Nauka, 1970. – 416 p.

10. Samoilov N. A. Mesto i rol' rabot S.M. Georgievskogo v formirovanii obraza Kitaia v Rossii v 80-kh godakh KhIKh v. // Filologiia i istoriia stran Azii i Afriki. Tezisy nauchnoi konferentsii, posviashchennoi 50-letiiu vossozdaniia Vostochnogo fakul'teta SPbGU. SPb.: Izd. dom Sankt-Peterburgskogo gos. unta, 1994. pp. 62–65.

11. Skachkov P. E. Ocherki istorii russkogo kitaevedeniia. M.: Nauka, 1977. – 505 p.

12. Suvorov V. V. Problema sootnosheniia istorii Kitaia s model'iu Evropeiskogo razvitiia v trudakh S.M. Georgievskogo. // Manuskript. 2017(10–2). pp. 155–157.

13. Khokhlov A. N. S.M. Georgievskii: k 100-letiiu so dnia smerti vydaiushchegosia kitaeveda. // 25 nauchnaia konferentsiia «Obshchestvo i gosudarstvo v Kitae». M.: Nauka, 1994. pp. 283–291.


Review

For citations:


Luo X. Critique of Eurocentrism: The Sinological Position of S. M. Georgievsky. Modern Oriental Studies. 2025;7(4):112-122. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/2686-9675-4-2025-112-122

Views: 11

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2686-9675 (Print)
ISSN 2782-1935 (Online)