Critique of Eurocentrism: The Sinological Position of S. M. Georgievsky
https://doi.org/10.24412/2686-9675-4-2025-112-122
Abstract
The article examines the scholarly position of the Russian sinologist S. M. Georgievsky, who in the second half of the 19th century opposed the prevailing Eurocentrism in sinology. In his works and polemics with contemporaries, he refuted the stereotype of China’s “stagnation,” highly valued Confucianism as a source of spiritual and social development and positively assessed the modernization reforms of the late Qing era. S. M. Georgievsky emphasized the independence and progressive potential of Chinese civilization, foreseeing its growing role in world history. His research remains significant today, contributing to a rethinking of the civilizational dialogue between East and West.
References
1. Martin, W. A. P. The lore of Cathay, Edinburgh London: Oliphant, Anderson & Ferrier, 1901. – 472 p.
2. Berezanskaia L. V. Osobennosti razvitiia kitaiskoi tsivilizatsii v istoricheskoi kontseptsii S.M. Georgievskogo. // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2007(1), pp. 144–146.
3. Vasil'ev L. S. Korifei russkogo kitaevedeniia. // Istoriia i kul'tura Kitaia (Sbornik pamiati akademika V. P. Vasil'eva). M.: Nauka, 1974. pp.7–19.
4. Vasil'ev V. P. Okrytie Kitaia i dr. st. Akademika V. P. Vasil'eva. SPb.: zhurn. "Vestnik vsemirnoi istorii", 1900. – 164 p.
5. Georgievskii S. M. Printsipy zhizni Kitaia. SPb.: A. Ia. Panafidin, 1888. – 494 p.
6. Georgievskii S. M. Graf I. Tolstoi i «Printsipy zhizni Kitaia». SPb.: tip. I.N. Skorokhodova, 1889. – 69 p.
7. Georgievskii S.M. Vazhnost' izucheniia Kitaia. SPb.: Tip. I. N. Skorokhodova, 1890. – 286 p.
8. Dubrovin N. F. Nikolai Mikhailovich Przheval'skii. SPb.: Voennaia tip., 1890. – 602 p.
9. Nikiforov V. N. Sovetskie istoriki o problemakh Kitaia. M.: Nauka, 1970. – 416 p.
10. Samoilov N. A. Mesto i rol' rabot S.M. Georgievskogo v formirovanii obraza Kitaia v Rossii v 80-kh godakh KhIKh v. // Filologiia i istoriia stran Azii i Afriki. Tezisy nauchnoi konferentsii, posviashchennoi 50-letiiu vossozdaniia Vostochnogo fakul'teta SPbGU. SPb.: Izd. dom Sankt-Peterburgskogo gos. unta, 1994. pp. 62–65.
11. Skachkov P. E. Ocherki istorii russkogo kitaevedeniia. M.: Nauka, 1977. – 505 p.
12. Suvorov V. V. Problema sootnosheniia istorii Kitaia s model'iu Evropeiskogo razvitiia v trudakh S.M. Georgievskogo. // Manuskript. 2017(10–2). pp. 155–157.
13. Khokhlov A. N. S.M. Georgievskii: k 100-letiiu so dnia smerti vydaiushchegosia kitaeveda. // 25 nauchnaia konferentsiia «Obshchestvo i gosudarstvo v Kitae». M.: Nauka, 1994. pp. 283–291.
Review
For citations:
Luo X. Critique of Eurocentrism: The Sinological Position of S. M. Georgievsky. Modern Oriental Studies. 2025;7(4):112-122. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/2686-9675-4-2025-112-122
JATS XML